Schools - too focused on the academic?
Recently, Mama Mia published an article saying that parents
expect teachers to be substitute parents. The article said that teachers should
be responsible for things like grammar and mathematics, while parents should
'mould the manner of the child.' You can find the original article here: http://www.mamamia.com.au/parenting/teachers-to-parents-raise-your-own-damned-kids/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=%24%7Bemail%7D&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+typepad%2FKsWc+%28%24%7BMamamia+-+rss%7D%29.
To a certain extent, I agree. Parents do need to take
responsibility for their own children. It is inappropriate and unfair to expect
teachers to raise their kids. And any parent who leaves the raising of their
child to a school cannot complain if their children don't turn out the way they want them to.
However, I do think the focus schools place on the academic
is not doing our children any favours. No matter how well you know your
reading, writing and arithmetic, if you don't know how to get along with
others, behave in certain situations and deal with your emotions, you're not
going to go far. In fact, it is these life skills that actually the more
important than academic results. They help people to succeed in a career and
contribute to society. It also affects how people treat our planet, the people
in it - and themselves. Ultimately, a person's test results will not bring
themselves or others much joy. How they live in the world will.
So why not just leave that part of life to the parents and
let the schools focus on the academic part?
First, children spend six hours in school, more when you add
in travelling time and homework. Very few parents would have the time to spend
six hours teaching their children values and life skills, once this time for
school is taken out. Admittedly, these kinds of life skills are often woven
throughout other activities. But even then, children will always receive more
academic training than they do values or life skills training.
Also, the compulsory nature of school and the focus on tests
like NAPLAN tells kids that academic performance is important. They are
unlikely to feel the same about what their parents are trying to teach them.
The weight given to academic results actually changes children's values,
because they have been taught from a very early age that it's how well you read
and write that really matters in life. Children need to be taught that their
behaviours, values and attitudes matter too. No matter how much a parent tries
to instil this in their children, if they're hearing opposite messages from
elsewhere, then children will have difficulty fully accepting this.
Perhaps most importantly, teachers have far more opportunity
to see how a child behaves with other people than the parents do. They are
better placed to notice a problem and guide them through a situation. One of my
sons is very shy and has trouble making friends. While I am constantly working
with him on this, I am limited by the fact that, when he's around people of his
own age, I'm not usually around. As there are children with learning
difficulties, there are also children with social difficulties. It would be
good to see them get the same assistance and guidance as those who don't do
well on tests.
I don't want to suggest that schools are only focused on the
academic. Schools do care about values. They do deal with behaviour problems.
At least the schools my kids go to do. I'm sure other schools are the same. But
in a world where schools are judged on their NAPLAN results, obviously they're
going to pay more attention to academic learning than life learning. And in my
opinion, life learning is more important.
Ultimately, it is the parent's responsibility to raise their
children. And I for one don't want to leave all that important training to a school.
However, the saying goes that it takes a village to raise a child. Shouldn't
then both parents and schools be involved in ensuring that we raise children
who have all the necessary skills to help them succeed in life? A school must
be judged by more than how well their students do in tests.
Tweet
Liz,
ReplyDeleteA couple of points.
1. NAPLAN is not an academic test, rather a diagnostic tool used by schools to address literacy and numeracy with individual students. This is not academic, rather a necessity for life. If people cannot read, comprehend, infer, calculate, add, subtract etc, how do we expect them to be a part of society?
2. Schools are extremely focussed on holistic education of the person, however, I think you're missing the point, teachers are now expected to be involved in the traditional parenting roles.
3. When teaching a class of 29-30 people, it becomes extremely hard to meet the simple and basic criteria set out by the curriculum, if you are also expected to teach these people things like manners and other life skills. This is harder for high schools, where teachers see students for approximately an hour a day.
4. Each school is different. Some are results driven othrs focus on how the individual performs, and their personal best. It becomes the parents' decision which school they send their child to. Please don't pool all schools into the same basket, it debases the majority of teachers out there who struggle with just getting a student to be the best they can be.
5. Try being a teacher for a day, then you'll get where I'm coming from